‘Keep’ is cheap-Indira Jaising October 23, 2010 1:57:32 AM Abraham Thomas | New Delhi ASG says SC should delete offensive word from ruling A day after the Supreme Court gave a historic decision depriving a woman who is a “keep” from maintenance in a live-in relationship, a senior woman law officer derided the judges for using such “derogatory” expression and demanded it to be expunged. Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Indira Jaising, the first woman ASG, instrumental in drafting some of the pro-women legislations in the country, including the Protection of Women Against Domestic Violence Act 2005, felt offended with the use of the term “keep” in the body of the Apex Court decision. On spotting her in court, the Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and TS Thakur in a jocular vein sought her comments on the decision by saying, “You are the author of the Domestic Violence Act,” and invited her comment on their decision defining the kind of live-in relationship entitled for alimony under Section 20 of the Domestic Violence Act. Jaising retorted saying, “I have had a role to play in drafting the law, but I must say I have read the full text of the judgment and I have strong objection against the use of words ‘keep’ and ‘one night stand’.” Silenced by such criticism of their controversial judgement, the junior judge on the Bench, Justice Thakur, sought to ease the situation by suggesting that the use of word “concubine” could have been appropriate. But Jaising was not pacified. An elected member of Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, a global woman body that receives reports from all countries including India, Jaising said she was appalled at the use of such terms by the highest court of the land. “Basically by saying woman is a “keep” we are demeaning the status of a woman… I don’t expect this from the Supreme Court in the 21st century. If this is the way the courts feel about women, I must say I feel offended,” she said. By this point, the embarrassment of the judges was not hidden as it persuaded her to focus on the case she had to argue relating to a service matter. Speaking to The Pioneer, Jaising later regretted having made public her displeasure about the judgment. “I believe somebody should file an application for expunging these remarks,” she said, adding, “the law prevailing globally on the subject seeks to eliminate any form of discrimination that stereotypes women.” With the judges shell-shocked by the torrent of protest, that too coming from a senior counsel of good standing on women issues, the Bench reluctantly conveyed to Jaising, “It is open for you to file a review application.” Not relenting, Jaising argued: “Will the court ever say that a man is a keep of a woman… so there is an element of discrimination.” |
Friday, October 22, 2010
‘Keep’ is cheap-Indira Jaising
Thursday, August 12, 2010
"A Unique style of Suppression of vital Information and Documents pertaining to Project MIHAN and SEZ by MADCL"
"A Unique style of Suppression of vital Information and Documents pertaining to Project MIHAN and SEZ by MADCL"
Penal Action demanded against the MADCL official by RTI applicant
Nagpur, dated 12.08.2010.
Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd. (MADCL) has adopted a Unique style of Suppression of vital important relevant Information and Documents pertaining to Project MIHAN and SEZ and denied the said information & document by a order passed in a most casual manner by its Public Information Officer straightaway rejecting the application seeking said relevant vital and important information and document.
Interestingly, this all is done by Mr. C.S.Gupta, Public Information Officer and Chief Engineer of MADCL at Mumbai who having sit on an application under RTI submitted on 22.01.2009, surprisingly disposed off the same without providing a single information or documents vide his letter dated 06.08.2010 i.e. after keeping silence on it for more than 18 months.
Adv. Mr. Vinod Tiwari, General Secretary of Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti, who had applied to MADCL on 22.01.2009 under Right to Information Act has now filed an appeal to Appellate Authority - now with Mr. R.C.Sinha, VC & CMD of MADCL and also lodged his complaint with Chief Information Commissioner of Maharashtra for taking appropriate action against the PIO of MIHAN - MADCL u/s 24 of RTI Act which provides a penalty @ Rs. 250 per day upon deliberate and willful attempt not to provide information under RTI Act to the applicant, the amount of such penalty comes to Rs.1,35,000/-, if imposed by Chief Information Commissioner.
It all happened when the RTI applicant - Adv. Tiwari upon concrete information that MADCL has caused great irregularities and illegalities in its functioning in gross violation of the provisions of various Llaws, Statutes, Rules, Regulations and the Constitutional provisions governing Panchayat Raj & the fundamental rights of the citizens specially the farmers, in which acquisition of land has been done on misleading & false information and entire process of land acquisition was being wrong and illegal ab-initio and its onward allotment & disposal of the said land to various units was also done and highly illegal and in irregular manner.
The said application under RTI was came to be filed in order to verify the said allegations prior to filing a Litigation and/or other alternate remedies, applicant wanted this relevant & most vital information at this stage and hence submitted the application under RTI to MADCL for getting following important information and documents, as sought by Adv. Tiwari
1. Copy of Govt. of Maharashtra notification regarding permission / Authority for incorporation of Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd. (MADCL) as a Special Purpose Company (SPC) with details of authorized & paid up share capital of shareholders of said SPC Company.
2. Copy of Govt. of Maharashtra notification issued under Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act declaring MADCL as Special Planning Authority for MIHAN Project.
3. Copy of Govt. of Maharashtra Draft Development Plan/map alongwith Draft development control rule framed by MADCL as Special Planning Authority for MIHAN Project.
4. Copy of Govt. of Maharashtra approved/sanction development plan/map alongwith approved / sanctioned development control rule framed by MADCL as Special Planning Authority for MIHAN Project.
5. Copy of Govt. of Maharashtra Draft & Approved/sanction (both) development map of land use planning alongwith approved / sanctioned development control rule framed by MADCL as Special Planning Authority for MIHAN Project.
6. Copies of No Objection Certificates & Resolution passed by Gram Panchayats – Local Bodies of the respective villages falling under the boundaries & jurisdiction of MIHAN PROJECT.
7. Copies of application made by MADCL for the purpose of Environmental Clearance submitted for MIHAN Project as a whole to Ministry of Environment & Forest, Govt. of India, New Delhi and also to Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB).
8. Copy of Environment Clearance issued by Ministry of Environment & Forest., Govt. of India, New Delhi for various projects under MIHAN.
9. Copies of Consent to Establish & Consent to Operate issued by MPCB for various projects under MIHAN.
10. Copies of Balance sheets & Statement of Accounts of MADCL for the financial year 2001-2002, 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 as on the year ending date on respective date - 31st March of the respective closing year.
11. Copies of applications filed with Land Acquisition Officers for acquisition of land alongwith details the documents appended to the said applications.
12. Copies of Government Notification issued by Land Acquisition Officer for acquisition of land and award passed therein.
13. Details of funds made available to the Land Acquisition Officer against respective applications and notifications of Land Acquisition made by the MADCL from time to time.
14. Copies of applications of SEZ made by MADCL to Ministry of Commerce, New Delhi.
15. Copies of entire correspondence by and between MADCL and Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industires, New Delhi in respect of SEZ Project of MADCL alongwith copies of permission, approvals, rejections, withdrawals received in respect of said SEZ Project.
16. Copies of sanction of financial advance / assistance / Bank Loan, etc. received by MADCL from respective bankers.
17. Copies of application of funds out of the bank loan availed.
18. Copies of statement of accounts of the amount spent on the overseas & Inland Tour & Travels by the Vice-Chairman & MD of MADCL and other Directors of MADCL which has been spent from the accounts of MADCL for the period 01-04-2002 to 31stMarch, 2008 (7 Years).
19. Copies and Statement of Accounts of amount spent on publicity & propaganda of MIHAN Project by deploying different rented agencies / political leaders including funds made available to such rented political leaders for advocating the MIHAN Project through various Workshops, Seminars, Presentations and Conferences held at various places in India & Abroad during last 7 Years.
20. Details of land allotment by MADCL to different parties, Details of infrastructure being made available alongwith the amounts spent on such infrastructure till date, Details of land used by the respective companies / beneficiaries. Details of unutilized lands by such companies, Details of balance and surplus land with MADCL, Details of allotment orders in such allotment of lands and the conditions of such allotment.
21. Details of the selling rates, amount recovered from respective allottees till date.
22. Details of litigations with land owners, land allottees and other parties filed by MADCL or filed against MADCL by the different persons / parties and its present status.
23. Copies of correspondence by & between MADCL with Airport Authority of India & Ministry of Civil Aviation, Govt of India, New Delhi in connection with various issues pertaining to the Projects of MADCL at Nagpur, Nasik, Kolhapur, Jalgaon & other cities of Maharashtra & Andhra Pradesh.
24. Copies of letters and correspondence by & between MADCL and Nellore Andhra Pradesh Project of AP and other projects in Maharashtra and Karnataka being undertaken by MADCL.
But, when the applicant Adv. Tiwari started following up for the said information sought by himMr. C.S.Gupta, Public Information Officer and Chief Engineer of MADCL at Mumbai having sit on application under RTI submitted on 22.01.2009, surprisingly disposed off the same without providing a single information or documents vide his letter dated 06.08.2010 i.e. after keeping silence on it for more than 18 months. In his order passed in a very casual manner rejected entire application without disposing it on merit in brazen violation of the provisions of Right to Information Act and killing the process of transparency in the Government control bodies like MIHAN and MADCL. Now applicant Adv. Mr. Tiwari has prefered an appeal to Appellate Authority - now with Mr. R.C.Sinha, VC & CMD of MADCL and also lodging his complaint with Chief Information Commissioner of Maharashtra for taking appropriate action against the PIO of MIHAN u/s 24 of RTI Act which provides a penalty @ Rs. 250 per day upon deliberate and willful attempt not to provide information under RTI Act to the applicant.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
38 days on, no word on kidnapped forest official-Indian Express

38 days on, no word on kidnapped forest official
It’s been over a month and there is no trace of Vilas Bardekar, social forestry officer from Pune, who was kidnapped by suspected BODO militants on May 12 in West Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh. While government officials are tight lipped about the developments, family and friends have been praying for the safe release of the officer.
Minister of Forests Patangrao Kadam said, “We have appointed a nodal officer who is looking into the matter. I don’t want to comment on the issue.” “We have strict restrictions from government authorities and are not allowed to comment on the issue. The efforts are on and we are hoping for Bardekar’s safe release,” said Prakash Thosare, director, social forestry.
A number of social organisations working for Bardekar’s release have been blaming the government officials for their incapability to deal with the situation. “It has been about 40 days and the government has not appointed a single person to follow up the case. On June 4, we wrote a letter to President Pratibha Patil requesting her to look into the matter. It is learnt that the militants are now asking for ransom,” said kishor Tiwari, president, Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti. “The response would not have been similar if a minister’s near and dear one was kidnapped,” said Kishor Rithe, president, Satpuda Foundation.
“We have been told that the negotiations are on and something positive should soon come out. The militants have put in fresh demands asking for ransom and as per our knowledge, the government is dealing with it. The family is going through a tough time,” said Sudhakar Shankarrao Suratkar, Bardekar’s brother-in-law.
Friday, June 4, 2010
Environment Day Appeal :Vidarbha reports 213 Human ,more than 2300 Bats ,312 Monkeys Deaths due to Heat wave in last ten days
Environment Day Appeal :Vidarbha reports 213 Human ,more than 2300 Bats ,312 Monkeys Deaths due to Heat wave in last ten days,’ water scarcity forcing more than 12 Million People to drink Toxic Water
The heat wave sweeping across vidarbha claimed 213 lives while there are wide spread reports of deaths of more than 2300 bats and 312 monkeys due to on going Heat Wave The death toll in Vidarbha region of Maharashtra mounted to 213 since May 24, 2010 as per reports of these deaths came from Nagpur, Buldhana, Bhandara, Chandrapur, Amravati and Gadchiroli districts,Vidarbha Janandolan Samiti (VJAS) informed in a press note today.
Here is the date wise death count of victims due to on going Heat wave
Date | Death Due to Heat wave in vidarbha |
24th may | 30 |
25th may | 31 |
26 th may | 36 |
27th may | 33 |
28th May | 18 |
29th May | 11 |
30th May | 10 |
31ST May | 14 |
1st JUNE | 12 |
2nd JUNE | 08 |
TOTAL | 213 |
Chandrapur,Yavatmal,Akola ,Amaravati ,Buldhana and Washim has crossed whewa s wardha reported allmost 50°C this year and water crisis is adding fuel to the scorching heat wave as region is reeling under drought and state administration has shown it’s inability to tackle the crisis ,VJAS added.
The uncontrolled water mining and mega deforestation in central
=========================================================
Thursday, June 3, 2010
The agony & the ajaat -P. Sainath
![]() Date:04/06/2010 URL: http://www.thehindu.com/2010/06/04/stories/2010060455241300.htm Back
Opinion - News Analysis
![]() “CASTE IS EVERYTHING”: Chaitanya Prabhu and Shyam Maharaj, the surviving grandsons of ajaat founder Ganpati Maharaj, at Shyam's house in Mangrul (Dastgir) village of Amravati district. Amitabh Bachchan says that if ever asked about his caste by Census enumerators, his answer would be: Caste – Indian. That, of course, would do little more than stoke the media's bollywood feeding frenzy yet again. Shyam Maharaj is no Bachchan. Nor is his brother, Chaitanya Prabhu. But they and the followers of their fraternity will likely throw up far more complex answers — and questions — if Census enumerators do finally pop that query on caste. “Our answer: we are ajaat. Here is my school leaving certificate to prove that. But you can write what you like,” Prabhu tells us at his house in Mangrul (Dastgir) village of Amravati district. Ajaat: this literally means ones without caste. The ajaat was a bold social movement of the 1920s and '30s that at its peak had tens of thousands of committed followers in what are present-day Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. It was led by the colourful and eccentric social reformer Ganpati Bhabhutkar better known as Ganpati Maharaj. Chaitanya Prabhu and Shyam Maharaj are his surviving grandsons. Apart from the usual anti-liquor and anti-violence norms of such movements, Ganpati Maharaj threw in others. He attacked caste frontally. Many stopped idol worship at his call. He pressed for gender equality and even railed against private property. And, in the 1930s, he and his followers declared themselves as ‘ ajaat.' His inter-caste dining drive raised hackles in the villages he worked in. As one of his disciples P. L. Nimkar put it: “he would ask his followers from all castes to bring cooked food from their homes. This, he would mix up totally and distribute the mix as prasad.” Caste was his great target. “Inter-caste weddings and widow remarriage — that's what he sought and achieved,” says Prabhu. “In our own family, from granddad to us, we married into eleven different castes, from brahmins to dalits. In our extended family there have been scores of such weddings. Ganpati Maharaj himself had such a marriage.” He also “created the religion of ‘ maanav' (humanity) and opened the temple here to dalits, offending the upper castes,” says Shyam Maharaj. “They filed cases against him and no one would touch his case. All the vakils here at the time were brahmins.” The movement waned over years, as some followers left on the caste issue, and with its Gurus's death in 1944. (He is buried at a community centre he built here decades ago, just opposite Prabhu's home). Still, it remained known and respected for some time after independence. “See my school leaving certificate,” says Prabhu, showing it to us. “As late as the 1960s, even the ‘70s, we still got certificates calling us ajaat. Now, schools and colleges say they've never heard of us and won't give our children admission.” The surviving ajaat are not doing too well. Shyam and Prabhu just about make ends meet as petty agricultural traders. Forgotten by the late ‘70s, the ajaat were re-discovered some years ago by Nagpur journalists Atul Pandey and Jaideep Hardikar who wrote about their plight in Marathi and English respectively. Their reports sparked a Maharashtra government move to help them. But that died with the exit of the one senior official who had shown interest in the matter. Ajaat candidates can't contest panchayat polls. Poll officials refuse to accept their forms — which state no caste. “ Ajaat folk can't get ration cards without a huge struggle,” says Prabhu. College admissions, scholarships and government jobs elude them for the same reasons. Other villagers won't marry into these families now as their caste status lacks clarity. In short, the followers of a once proud anti-caste reform movement have been reduced to a couple of thousand people viewed as something like a caste themselves. “My niece Sunaina could not get into college,” says Prabhu. “The college said: ‘we don't recognise this ajaat. Bring us a proper caste certificate and we'll admit her'.” His nephew Manoj who did finally make it to college says: “They treat us as an oddity there. There were no scholarships for any of us. No one there believes such a thing as ajaat exists.” A restless younger generation feels imprisoned by the past. Many of the ajaat, including Prabhu's family, have faced the ignominy of having to trace out an ancestor whose caste could be clearly proven. “Imagine our humiliation,” he says. “We have to take out caste certificates for our children.” Not easy, given the generations of inter-caste marriages these families have seen. And even the ledger of the village kotwal lists them as ‘ ajaat.' Some have had to trace a great grandfather whose caste could be established. “To recover and rebuild those old records is a horrible job,” says Prabhu. “The authorities suspect us of concealing things and faking our caste. And it hurts us like anything to make these caste certificates. But without them our children are truly stuck.” Sadly, they had no choice but to trace out the caste origin of anti-caste crusader Ganpati Maharaj himself. That was needed for his great-grandchildren. Quite a few of the remaining 2,000 or so ajaat gather at that centre in this village in November each year. “Now there is only one such family we have contact with in Madhya Pradesh,” says a glum Prabhu. The rest are in Maharashtra. “Only 105 are formally registered with our body, the ajaatiya maanav sanstha. But far more than that come to our annual meeting. However, consider that we once had 60,000 members in this movement.” “We need a much more comprehensive survey of caste than the mere introduction of a question in the Census will permit,” says economist Dr. K. Nagaraj (formerly with the Madras Institute of Development Studies) who has worked on the subject. “That we need caste data is beyond doubt. But we need that data in a frame that captures the huge diversity, location-specific nature, and the many other complexities of caste. A single question in the 2011 census will not achieve that. This is perhaps a job for the National Sample Survey and its team of trained investigators with much advance preparation.” So what happens if that enumerator does come around to your house with the question on caste? “Believe me,” says Prabhu, “It will confuse him. I think they should create a different category in the Census for people like us. We must declare who we are. We have fought against everything that stands for caste. But in this society, caste is in everything.” © Copyright 2000 - 2009 The Hindu |
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
VJAS demands C.B.I. Probe Mihan- Satyam land deal
VJAS demands C.B.I. Probe Mihan- Satyam land deal
Vidarbha Janandolan Samiti (VJAS) in letter to Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan singh has demanded C.B.I. probe in to massive allged corruption and land scam in Satyam land deal after the recent report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) that Maharashtra Government, operating through the Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd (MADC) helped Satyam Computers acquire land at damned cheap rate in MIHAN. The comptroller and auditor general (CAG) has slammed the state government for granting an “undue benefit” of Rs20.21 crore to Satyam Computer Services Limited (SCSL). The company was given land at a rate much lower than the existing market price for the Multi-model International Passenger and
VJAS has recalled PMO regarding their complaint and PMO enquiry through ministry of company affairs in which the role R C Sinha, the then Vice Chairman and Managing Director (VC&MD) of Maharashtra Airport Development Company (MADC), for the role he played in the Satyam as well as in other deals and his links R C Sinha had with a Satyam subsidiary namely MAYTAS (‘Satyam’ if read in reverse) alleging the massive corruption and giving protecting vested interests of local politicians The CAG has now rapped the Maharashtra Government for giving "undue benefit of over Rs 20 crore" to controversial Satyam Computer Services Limited by selling land at lower rates in Multimodal International Hub Airport (MIHAN) project at Nagpur.
VJAS in the earlier complaint odd t.10th jan.2009 questioned the role of R C Sinha in allotment of land to Satyam Computer Services , was it because Sinha was Chairman of Maytas Infra (the company whose involvement brought about the disgraceful downfall of Satyam), dual role which has caused loss Rs.20 crore to public exchanger which fullest knowledge of chief minister and leader of opposition
As per CAG report that states, "The Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (MADC) allotted 100 acre land to Satyam at a lower rate of Rs 18 lakh per acre against applicable rate of Rs 24.28 lakh considering it as an ‘early bird’ offer."
The report questions the logic behind allotting land to Satyam, an IT company, at a far cheaper rate when another IT major Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited was given land at the rate of Rs 26.30 lakh per acre.
Scoffing at the ‘early bird offer’ idea advanced by Sinha for Satyam , the CAG says that how can Satyam be considered an early bird when Shapoorji Pallonji, too, was awarded the land on the same day i.e. December 5, 2005, but at a far higher price tag. MADC had approved 100 acre of land at MIHAN to Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited at the rate of Rs 26.30 lakh per acre for an IT company on the same day’ says the CAG report.It is alleged that was close to B Ramalinga Raju, Founder and Chairman of Satyam Computer Services. The relations had thickened during the tenure of Chandrababu Naidu when Sinha was serving the Andhra Pradesh Government. It was during this time that Sinha was installed as the Chairman of the beleaguered company Maytas.
VJAS allaged that this fact that R.C.Sinha being the Chairman of Maytas and having the direct connection with fraudlent company (Maytas) where Ramalinga Raju had a 36 per cent share and allottment of land to Satyam (owned by Raju), has raised many eyebrows in the local media that time too but MIHAN being CONGREE-BJP-NCP combined money garbing project everybody kept intentional salient and nobody questioned whether it was proper for a Managing Director of MADC to ‘deal’ with a company (Maytas) where he himself was the Chairman. The CAG report has almost put a stamp on the fishy deal.Satyam was also given over 28 acres of additional land on March 3, 2007 without the approval of the competent authority at a cheaper rate, the report said.
VJAS has aslo urged for detail probe of the role of local politician and all national party leaders who received multi-crore election fund for Raju and undue protection given to R.C.Sinha evenafter mega fraud of satyam broke of out. R.C.Sinha was defened and asked to continue and he further robbed the state exchanger by thousand of crore .MIHAN nagpur is turning out to be biggest land scam of the maharashtra if C.B.I. is allowed to probe at micro level.
here are media reports and our earlier complaints -
I quote
CAG slams Mah for helping Satyam The Hitavada Impact By Rohinikant Matey
IT’S official now. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has stated that Maharashtra Government, operating through the Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd (MADC) helped Satyam Computers acquire land at damned cheap rate in MIHAN. This brings back into sharp focus R C Sinha, the then Vice Chairman and Managing Director (VC&MD) of Maharashtra Airport Development Company (MADC), for the role he played in the Satyam as well as in other deals.
The CAG finding has come as a vindication of The Hitavada story on January 11, 2009, questioning the role played by the MADC and its boss of the day. The Hitavada had exposed the tacit links R C Sinha had with a Satyam subsidiary namely MAYTAS (‘Satyam’ if read in reverse) and asked if that did not form vested interests that went against public interest.
The CAG has now rapped the Maharashtra Government for giving "undue benefit of over Rs 20 crore" to controversial Satyam Computer Services Limited by selling land at lower rates in Multimodal International Hub Airport (MIHAN) project at Nagpur.
Did R C Sinha grant extra-ordinary favours to Satyam Computer Services while allotting land to the now-maligned company at MIHAN, was the pointed question raised by The Hitavada then. And was it because Sinha was Chairman of Maytas Infra (the company whose involvement brought about the disgraceful downfall of Satyam), a connection nobody was aware of at the highest level, was the poser.
Coming down heavily on the Maharashtra Government, the CAG report states, "The Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (MADC) allotted 100 acre land to Satyam at a lower rate of Rs 18 lakh per acre against applicable rate of Rs 24.28 lakh considering it as an ‘early bird’ offer."
The report questions the logic behind allotting land to Satyam, an IT company, at a far cheaper rate when another IT major Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited was given land at the rate of Rs 26.30 lakh per acre.
Scoffing at the ‘early bird offer’ idea advanced by Sinha for Satyam , the CAG says that how can Satyam be considered an early bird when Shapoorji Pallonji, too, was awarded the land on the same day i.e. December 5, 2005, but at a far higher price tag.
‘Incidentally, MADC had approved 100 acre of land at MIHAN to Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited at the rate of Rs 26.30 lakh per acre for an IT company on the same day’ says the CAG report.
It was a well known fact that Sinha was close to B Ramalinga Raju, Founder and Chairman of Satyam Computer Services. The relations had thickened during the tenure of Chandrababu Naidu when Sinha was serving the Andhra Pradesh Government. It was during this time that Sinha was installed as the Chairman of the beleaguered company Maytas.
Surprisingly, nobody in the MADC or at the Government level was aware of Sinha being the Chairman of Maytas. The direct connection of Sinha with a company (Maytas) where Ramalinga Raju had a 36 per cent share and allottment of land to Satyam (owned by Raju), has raised many eyebrows in the Mantralaya.
Questions were raised whether it was proper for a Managing Director of MADC to ‘deal’ with a company (Maytas) where he himself was the Chairman. The CAG report has almost put a stamp on the fishy deal.
Satyam was also given over 28 acres of additional land on March 3, 2007 without the approval of the competent authority at a cheaper rate, the report said.
------------
Maharashtra govt gave `undue benefit’to Satyam
PTI, May 3, 2010, 03.18pm IST"The Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (MADCL) allotted 100 acre land to Satyam at a lower rate of Rs 18 lakh per acre against applicable rate of Rs 24.28 lakh considering it as an 'early bird' offer," the report said.
The land was given to Satyam to set up an IT company at MIHAN on December 5, 2005.
Incidentally, MADCL had approved 100 acre of land at MIHAN to Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited at the rate of Rs 26.30 lakh per acre for an IT company on the same day.
"The sale of land to Satyam at lower rate was not justifiable and it resulted in a loss of revenue of Rs 6.28 crore to MADCL owing to undue benefit offered to Satyam," the report said.
Satyam was also given over 28 acres of additional land on March 3, 2007 without the approval of the competent authority at the rate of Rs 22.35 lakh per acre while the market price during 2005-06 was Rs 72 lakh per acre, the report said.
"The allotment of additional land without the approval of competent authority at less than the prevailing market price of land was irregular and resulted in loss of revenue of Rs 13.93 crore," it said.
3)Satyam land deal robbed the state of Rs20cr: CAG
Surendra Gangan / DNA Monday,
http://www.dnaindia.com/dnaprint910.php?newsid=1378306
May 3, 2010 1:21
The comptroller and auditor general (CAG) has slammed the state government for granting an “undue benefit” of Rs20.21 crore to Satyam Computer Services Limited (SCSL).
The company was given land at a rate much lower than the existing market price for the Multi-model International Passenger and
And SCSL was given the concession without the approval of the board of directors of the Maharashtra Airport Development Company (MADC), nodal agency for the project.
While selling land to the various companies establishing their facilities at the special economic zone in Mihan, the rate finalised by the board of directors was Rs24.28 lakh per acre.
However, SCSL was given land at the rate of Rs18 lakh per acre. It resulted in a loss of Rs6.28 crore for the MADC, and subsequently for the government.
On the other hand, Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Limited (SPCL) had to buy land at Rs26.3 lakh per acre — a rate higher than the quoted price.
After the first deal at a discounted rate in 2005, SCSL made a request for additional land. The company was allotted 28.06 acres of additional land at the rate of Rs22.35 lakh per acre in March 2007. This was done without approval of the board of directors.
The market price during 2005-06 was Rs72 lakh per acre, as offered by M/s Reatox Builders & Developers for the non-processing zones. The irregularity led to a revenue loss of Rs13.93 crore. The total loss in the two deals was Rs20.21 crore, the CAG report has said.
In its clarification to the CAG, the MADC management has said that the first allotment to SCSL and the SPCL deal was not made on the same day. However, the CAG is not ready to buy it.
“Advertisement for the land was given in December 2004, while the Centre approved the SEZ in August 2005. For the allotments to SCSL and SPCL, it is true that they were not done on the same day, but both proposals were approved in the same meeting on December 5, 2005,” the report said.
4)Samiti demands probe into MADC MD's involvement in Satyam-PTI
| |
| |
January 10,2009 | |
Source: PTI | |
Samiti demands probe into MADC MD's involvement in Satyam
| |
Nagpur, Jan 10 (PTI) Vidarbha Janandolan Samiti has demanded a probe into the role and links of Maharashtra Airport Development Company (MADC) managing director R C Sinha in the accounting fraud of Satyam Computers. Sinha, in his capacity as MD of MADC, has signed agreements with Satyam-promoted Maytas company where he was the chairman at the same time, Samiti president Kishor Tiwari said in a statement here today.Maharashtra government should immediately relieve Sinha from MADC and from the ambitious MIHAN project where Satyam had plans to come up with a unit, it said.Samiti has demanded a CBI probe into the alleged links of Sinha with Satyam, Maytas and over all fruad. It has also written to Chief Minister Ashok Chavan to look into alleged fraud.
|
5)Satyam Scam : Maytas Infra ex-Chairman R.C. Sinha misleading ,admits to hold directorship of two other MADC beneficiaries companies
NAGPUR-13th January 2009
Whole vidarbha has been shocked to learn the news that the main man behind MIHAN - Multiti-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport at
MADC managing director R C Sinha has come out with shocking admission that he is till director of Indu Developers Similarly, he has been on Bengal Ambuja board for eight years. This company is a joint venture between West Bengal Housing Board and the Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited. Indu Developers and Ambuja Realty are reported to have been allotted Mihan land at much cheaper rates but MADC managing director R C Sinha says that there was no clash of interest .
‘Infact companies in which MADC managing director R C Sinha is associated have been benefited ,it matter of pure misuse of power and multi thousand corruption hence we are asking for probe over the matter’ Kishor Tiwari president ( Vidarbha Jan andolan Samiti) asked in a press note today as earlier he in letter to Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan asked to arrange C.B.I. enquiry in to involvement of very senior retd. I.A.S officer till working on special duty on sensitive project like MIHAN in which Maytas Infra has been given big land by Maharashtra Airport Development Ltd. (MADC) controlled by Shri. R.C. Sinha.
VJAS has objected the duel status of Shri. R.C. Sinha, as as Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Maharashtra Airport Development Ltd. (MADC) and chairman of Maytas Infra Pvt.Ltd and raised issue of legitimate permission and morality as MIHAN - Multi-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport at Nagpur is dream project of all politicians expecting creation of millions of jobs for vidarbha youths .
VJAS has brought the attention of Maharashtra Govt. over the media reports of diversion huge fund to Maytas Infra Pvt.Ltd in the mega projects of Hyderabad metro rail and others projects in pipeline .VJAS has urged administration that MADC managing director R C Sinha is making the statements like he is man beyond the law of land and he has obliged Maharashtra Govt. to bring his own companies in MIHAN and now the whole matter needs scanner and clarification, Tiwari added.
============
unquote
VJAS has objected the duel status of Shri. R.C. Sinha, as as Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Maharashtra Airport Development Ltd. (MADC) and chairman of Maytas Infra Pvt.Ltd and raised objection on the salience of maharashtra chief minister Ashok chavan keeping him as MIHAN - Multi-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport at Nagpur is dream project of all politicians expecting creation of millions of jobs for vidarbha youths,it shows all are directely involved in this mega corruption which needs C.B.I. probe to nail to truth to thr public
==========================================
Please release this pres note
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
For VIDARBHA JAN ANDOLAN SAMITI
KISHORE TIWARI
PRESIDENT
contact-09422108846
Posted by VIDARBHA JAN ANDOLAN SAMITI at 3:36 AM